PLANS for a controversial development proposed for Newton Abbot have been labelled 'premature' by councillors at Teignbridge Council Development Control Committee.
A developer wanted to build a three-storey building comprising six one-bedroom flats at Riverside Works. But Ivybridge-based Benchmark Homes has been asked to go back to the drawing board in the wake of numerous concerns about the scheme.
The proposed development – on a site currently occupied by a derelict motor repair workshop – had gained initial approval, but was knocked back at a council planning committee. Although outline permission had been granted in 2000 for six flats, the application had previously only suggested a two-storey building.
The current design details would have resulted in the development being 2.5 metres higher than surrounding two-storey buildings. Councillors objected to the changes, stating that the three-storey building would be out of character with surrounding properties and would cause a loss of amenities and privacy to neighbouring residents in Gladstone Place.
Arguments were put forward for the need for proper consideration of the site in the context of the local area. Cllr David Corney-Walker said: 'It was very evident to those present at the site inspection – who were unanimous – that in it's context it would have been totally out of character. The original plans were much more acceptable.'
He added: 'I'm sure an agreement would be favourable, as we do need a development like this.' The plans have sparked outrage for residents amid fears over added pressure on vehicular access and sewage pipes. Maureen Watkins, of Gladstone Place, said: 'Being a resident who has had the worrying experience of two floods due to drainage problems and sewerage overflow, I am very concerned that the extra housing will cause even more problems.'
Tabitha Johnson, of Gladstone Place, wrote to councillors saying: 'Parking capacity here is at its limit and it is unreasonable to expect this area to cope with any increase.'
Cllr Keith Smith labelled it 'a premature application,' saying that there were so many objections that more planning work needed to be done. David Bell, of Benchmark Homes, later said that the development was in keeping with the government's priority to developing under-utilised land within the urban area, adding: 'I'm very disappointed with the decision not to take this opportunity to clear up and replace this eyesore with some much-needed entry level housing.'