KATE ROBERTS, of Teignmouth, writes: I refer to J B Munn's letter on March 31, in which was raised the issue of 'spin and cover ups' regarding the Spirit of Teignmouth. I believe that I am not alone in thinking that there are several questions that have not received a satisfactory answer from either Teignbridge Council or Woodvale Events Ltd. It has not been made clear whether Teignbridge is within its rights to use the land covenanted to the people of Teignmouth for this purpose. It is my belief (and I would appreciate clarification from Teignbridge's solicitors on this) that under the Public Health Act (1936) certain restrictions apply as to the amount of time per year the council may close a public space to the general public. As Woodvale Events Ltd is now charging an entry fee of £1.50 per person – despite stating in its original publicity that admission would be free – I would argue that Teignbridge has, in effect, allowed the public space to be closed off. I would appreciate a clear answer as to why the town precept has been raised, as stated by the council, to cover the cost of promoting such events as the Spirit of Teignmouth. Are we to pay for the promotion of what has become a commercial enterprise? Furthermore, as a teacher, in my opinion Woodvale's claims for the educational benefits of the project are dubious at the very least. Perhaps the intended learning outcomes for our children are in citizenship and the underhanded dealings of local authorities?
